The Seven Deadly Sins
(Opera Ballet)
Picture: C+
Sound: B- Extras: D Program: C
Taped in the older analog High Definition format in 1993,
The Orchestra of the Lyon Opera presents Kurt Weill and Bertolt Brecht’s The
Seven Deadly Sins of the Petty Bourgeoisie (1933), but here is presented by
theater director Peter Sellars as a tired, stereotypical attack on the United
States. Both it and The Rise and Fall of the City of Mahagonny were set in a version of America then, while
Sellars mixes stage footage with footage of the real U.S. in the early 1990s.
Of course, the original play arrived as the Nazi’s rose,
and the only “bourgeoisie” to attack then were the Jews who where shipped off
to concentration camps. However, the
United States is now the great Satan to the likes of Sellars and his Seven
Deadly Sins is supposedly making the “big statement” about events in the
U.S. at the time. After 9/11 and plenty
of atrocities overseas, this ballet holds even less water that ever. It is very convenient how Old Europe at its
worse is ignored then and now, but let’s pretend to agree for a moment.
The U.S. is not above question, as Vietnam alone has
proven, but this interpretation happened as the senior George Bush was
president and Clinton had just succeeded him.
The singers/dancers have some talent, but it is not as if this were a
work that offered great challenges. Are
the potentials for “sin” greater in a country of more wealth? No, only the extent of which those sins are
carried through, as the Axis Powers proved.
Many want to defend such a work shallowly, saying “it’s art!” or “aren’t
they entitled to their opinion”. The
former is questionable; especially being several generations form the original
source, while the latter is as true for them as anyone (including this writer).
Running 47 minutes, it eventually becomes a broken record
of “you American’s are such Pigs!” that you can see for free on Fox News (or
CNN & MSNBC) 24-hours-a-day in their overseas reports. Another thing is how self-impressed Sellars
and company are with themselves, which is bared-out with the way the program
was recorded.
This is one of those rare programs shot in analog High
Definition videotape, before the digital versions arrived. It just adds to the pretension as if the
videographers were actually doing something visually innovate with the recorded
images. This is made more difficult on
their part by obvious stage performances and the one built in feature they
seemed to forget about Brecht: he was a
deconstructionist!!!
This is not as if ignorance ever stopped people like this
before, but the other issue here is that of trying to speak through other’s
words. This fails here as well. There is not one original thought here, nor
does the production have the guts to present one. Julie Taymor showed how this is possible with her film of
Shakespeare’s Titus in 1999.
Sellars cannot tell us Karl Marx said it all, without sounding like
Harpo Marx, but unfunny, all music, no words and absolutely no charm and little
talent.
As for the quality of that older HDTV, you can tell how
good it might have looked for its time, but some of the outdoor footage is not
as good, and the non-anamorphic 1.78 X 1 image is surprisingly soft. The Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo does decode
into Pro Logic, but it is lite. There
are no extras, possibly because Sellars thinks he is the extra.
If you want to see something about a Brecht work, you are
better off getting a book, seeing it live, or waiting for another DVD. Is it possible David Fincher has a clearer
understanding of this work?
- Nicholas Sheffo