Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Gangster > Drama > British > European > Russian > Den Of Lions

Den Of Lions

 

Picture: C+     Sound: C+     Extras: D     Film: C

 

 

The other day, someone asked when the next Gangster films were coming out.  I said The Sopranos had so overtaken the genre, that he should not expect any good films for a while.  It dawned on my associate that the logic made sense, but then the idea of such films out of and/or about the Russian Mob come up.  I said Red Bear (reviewed elsewhere on this site) was not horrible, but most such films had been lame to date.  Before I knew it, James Bruce’s Den of Lions arrived and it is easily one of the poorest of a long cycle of shockingly forgettable films on the subject.

 

Sure, some films have had Russian organized crime as side/supporting characters, but they never work for reasons we can examine in a minute.  In this story, the government over there asks for FBI help and they send an agent (Stephen Dorff) to go undercover to nail a major crime boss (Bob Hoskins, playing a scene chewing Bob Hoskins who happens to be playing a mob boss) who is out of control.  The two leads are good, but Hoskins was much more convincing as Khrushchev in playing the same ethnicity.

 

They are at the center of this film and that minimizes the ethnic culture of the location, which has been a problem with most films in this cycle.  Red Bear was at least a product of another cinema, while all we get here are tired clichés and conventions of old American Gangster cinema.  Add the film ignoring The Cold War and the politics of Capitalism versus Communism/Socialism and you get another work empty at the core.  No film has dared to ask why and how these criminals gained power after the fall of The Iron Curtain or bolder questions.  The one that does will be a classic.  This is not that film.

 

The anamorphically enhanced 1.85 X 1 image exhibits detail limits and poor video Black throughout to the point of some shots showing more degraded images than expected.  That is odd for a resent production, but that is what you get, on top of which the Dolby Digital 5.1 mix has surprisingly few palpable or consistent surrounds of any kind, while dialogue is often problematic.  With no extras, this is as basic as a poor basic film on DVD can get.

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com