Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Drama > Gay > To Die (Or Not)

To Die (or Not)

 

Picture: C+     Sound: C+     Extras: D     Film: C+

 

 

Ventura Pons continues his more serious attempts at multiple stories in a single film with To Die (or Not) (1999), but the twist in this case has him offering two possibilities.  Most of the film is shot in black and white (or is that drained color stock), while the latter third is in color.  These ideas of what might be are always hokey, because you can offer more alternatives than a single film has time to address.  Tom Tykwer’s Run Lola Run (1998) tries to overcome this with a smaller sketch done several times, but is also complicated by its ultimate failure as a run-on, no matter how complex.  It also has issues of “will to power” too close to German (and Nazi?) ideology to make for an essay elsewhere.  Pons’ film does not have that issue.

 

What Pons does offer is seven situations turning out one way, the death way, for starters.  It does become almost unintentionally comic when each scene ends in a death and fade out.  That hurts the film.  The color sequences are not as convincing, strangely enough, especially when a police car hitting a motor scooter offers two different riders.  Like Run Lola Run and David Fincher’s The Game (1997), it simply runs out of its ability to suspend disbelief before it is over.  In all cases, you really have to leave your brain at the door ultimately to survive without yawning.

 

While Lola was being philosophical (no matter how problematically), and The Game is subversive and critical of Corporatism (until it cops out in the end and goes on auto pilot), Pons film does not seem to have a clear-cut point.  It is certainly “Not” as daring or erotic as his previous films, and this idea of almost suggesting a higher force (the first motorist hears the voice of something like God), this has not been any part of his previous work and betrays the realism of his cannon of films.  The acting is not bad, but the film cannot even survive on that.

 

The letterboxed 1.85 X 1 image suffers from no anamorphic enhancement, and the black and white is the newer, lighter kind.  Too bad, for darker, more realistic monochrome (the type that retains its silver content) could have helped this film be somewhat more convincing, but only to a point.  The Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo is Pro Logic decodable, but is too dialogue-based to really be of demonstration quality.  It is well recorded, but not state-of-the art.  No extras are here, except the trailer at the end of the film.

 

After seeing three Pons films, with this being the latest, it seems he is in a downward arc as a filmmaker, so you will see more of his films on this site reviewed soon.  Even when he does not succeed, he is at least trying, which is more than I can say for way too many films coming out of Hollywood in the last twenty years.

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com