The Silence of the
Lambs (M-G-M & Criterion
Widescreen DVDs)
Picture: B- (vs. Criterion C+) Sound: B- each Extras: B+ each Film: A
NOTE: This film is now out on Blu-ray in a version that
looks and sounds better than both of these DVDs. You can read more about it at this link:
http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/8374/The+Silence+Of+The+Lambs+(1991
Jonathan Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs (1990) is
one of the most referenced, talked about, addressed, honored, stunning,
imitated films of all time. In its
thirteen years of existence so far, a sequel and prequel (itself a remake of a
prequel made seventeen years ago) have surfaced, plus the book Hannibal
was a huge publishing smash. Anthony
Hopkins is now one of the most well known, critically successful and
commercially in-demand actors around, and Jodie Foster reached yet another
plane of excellence in the process of the film’s success. With all that, could there remain any other
burning questions about the film that were actually left unanswered?
Well, yes. There is
one: If you want the film in a
widescreen DVD version, should you go out and buy the current M-G-M edition, or
should you try to hunt down a copy of the very valuable and collectible
Criterion Collection edition from 1998?
Just based on the extras, if you are a huge fan of the film, you should
really own both copies. The Criterion
version exclusively has a brilliant commentary track featuring Demme, Foster,
Hopkins, screenplay writer Ted Tally and the extremely insightful FBI expert
John Douglas. The storyboard comparisons
to actual scenes are cleverly done.
There is also an extremely extensive but priceless text section that
offers all
the profiles used by the FBI to classify serial killers
and other type killers, plus a sad and ugly section of many, many quotes form
the killer themselves that reminds us how ugly the underbelly of society can
get. Those reasons alone are reason to own
the Criterion DVD, which should have never went out of print, but M-G-M does
not want to license their titles, and they acquired the Orion Pictures catalog
about two years after Criterion re-issued their stunning LaserDisc edition on
DVD.
Both versions offer deleted scenes, but M-G-M takes them
from film footage supposedly lost, yet you need both DVDs to have all the goods
there. An outtakes section, old promo
documentary, new documentary for the DVD, Hopkins “phone message”, photo
gallery, and section of teasers/TV spots/theatrical trailers not on the
Criterion version are included here.
That brings us to the picture and sound quality, but we
should review the film first in brief.
Jodie Foster is Clarice Starling, a student FBI agent about to graduate
into full FBI-hood, when her superior Jack Crawford (Scott Glenn in this
version) asks her to visit the insane killer Dr. Hannibal “The Cannibal” Lector
(Anthony Hopkins). The doctor nearly
killed the agent who caught him, William Graham (William Peterson in Michael
Mann’s 1986 Manhunter, Edward Norton in 2002’s Red Dragon), so he
is extremely dangerous and is now literally behind glass. His reach exceeds his grasp, as he begins to
find an interest in the student trainee, and one of the most bizarre relationships
in cinema and literary history begins to form.
Like Graham needing to capture “The Tooth Fairy” before, Starling needs
Lector’s help to find “Buffalo Bill”, who is kidnapping oversized women for a
most horrifying purpose. Can Starling
get Lector to help her before he can get inside her head? Can Bill be
stopped before it’s too late? The stakes
are astronomically increased when the killer kidnaps Catherine Martin (Brooke
Smith), the daughter of a powerful Senator (Diane Baker).
That brings us to the picture. It turns out that if you look closely enough,
you can see the same exact print was used for both transfers. The 1.85 X 1 image, shot by Tak Fujimoto, in
one of the most memorable uses of that aspect ratio ever! It is brilliant and worthy of Horror classics
going back to the silent era. The
Original 12” LaserDisc offered one of the best images in the history of the
format and of The Criterion Collection.
The fullness of color, detail, solid look of objects, and consistency of
the transfer is remarkable for an analog-era telecine job. The Criterion DVD recycled this transfer in a
non-anamorphic version, but this did not retain all the great details or warmth
and presence. As a matter of fact, you
can see the image yellowing and a certain softness that is the result of the
recycling. The
M-G-M anamorphic DVD has a slightly sharper and cleaner
look, but the video black seems a generation down, with a slightly off gray
scale and color that is not always what it should be. That gives the DVD versions barely enough of
an edge to outdo the LaserDisc with B- each, while that Laser would get C+ by
today’s standards, despite some obvious advantages it has over its 5-inch
counterparts. The Criterion DVD does not
have the analog waves, while the M-G-M anamorphic does offer some depth over
the LD.
A very similar thing happened over two boxed sets the two
different companies did for Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey
(1968), with Kubrick himself supervising a 35mm transfer for a Criterion version. Later, when that went out of print, M-G-M
(still issuing the Turner/M-G-M catalog before Warner got it) put out a box
from 65mm elements. It had some
advantages over the Criterion, but not enough, and then ran into similar
problems when that transfer was recycled for DVD in a non-anamorphic
version. Warner re-issued the film in an
anamorphic version that was an improvement, but still had a 5.1 mix with bass
lacking and other picture details that still were not right. Both films will probably not be totally right
until the owners are forced to issue high-definition versions, but even then we
will have to wait.
The original LaserDisc offered the Dolby SR 4.0 matrixed
surround in some of the best PCM CD sound ever committed to LaserDisc or
Compact Disc for that matter. It had the
full range of sound and the film’s incredible sound design. The Criterion DVD’s Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo
surround version is not as clear, thick, or detailed. The M-G-M 5.1 remix has clearer dialogue, but
is missing the most bass, for whatever reason.
As a result, the DVDs rate B- each, but the LaserDisc sound would be
B+. The M-G-M might even have some
cleanness over both Criterions, but I believe only a DTS remix could resolve
all the problems. The sound was Academy
Award nominated and deserves the upgrade.
In the meantime, you might have to get both versions to
compare, but you might land up keeping both.
It takes both to show the almost complete picture of the film, yet it
still feels like something else should be there. The Criterion version is not astronomical in
secondary market price, thanks in part to M-G-M’s copy offering many goodies
and being readily available. You’ll just
have to see for yourself, if you can.
- Nicholas Sheffo