Taboo – The Beginning Of Erotic Cinema
Picture: C+
Sound: C+ Extras: C+ Documentary: B
In the case of almost any kind of filmmaking, going back
to either a genre’s roots or an older approach often is a smart thing to
do. In films that are “erotic” or more
specifically, show sex of a softcore or especially hardcore kind, that would be
useless and pointless. That the
hardcore XXX sex industry has gone virtually all to taped productions since the
early 1980s, despite its still-massive Billion-dollar annual profits, is
concession enough that titillation and profits with every kind of thing they
can show and sell is all they are about.
Even Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights (1997) shows how there
was an actual pride among those who were shooting on film. Taboo – The Beginning Of Erotic Cinema
is a surprisingly good, thorough and informative look at all that proceeded the
XXX hardcore cycle of the 1970s, starting with silent film materials in the
1920s.
The best thing about this program is all the archival
clips it manages to put together in its explanation of the rise of said works
includes the many shorts that slowly got things started. This is well researched and very
entertaining on many levels. Though
nothing very hardcore is shown, this is still a very hard R-rated type program
in nature to the point that an advisory menu pops up when you first play the
DVD. I have never run into this before,
but it is here after the credits.
This program is coy, but never idiotic, maturely handling
this history. Usually, many texts on
the subject gloss over these early decades, instead focusing on the softcore
and nude films of the 1960s, including cheesy Radley Metzger films we have
reviewed many of on this site. This is
followed by the battles over censorship and how eventually the counterculture
in part made the breakout of the sex film industry possible. Know that also like many of those texts, it
does note the underground side of things and the program is strictly on the
heterosexual films with Gayness as incidental, thought-police lesbianism for
straight men and no subcategories. This
is a mythbreaker beyond the obvious that the 1970s is not a time where hardcore
films suddenly arrived as if no one thought of them before.
Bettie Page and the first bondage cycle is covered as the
films go to full color, which is what virtually all of them have been shot in
ever since. The main program is
bookended by key 1970s trailer footage and the latter half has the infamous
Sylvester Stallone XXX film in its re-released form as The Italian Stallion. That trailer is shown in its entirety. He is named “Stud” and his ability to dance
has to be seen to be believed. With so
much sexuality all over the place, yet no one seeming to be able to still talk
about intimacy, writer/director Brandon Christopher has created a very useful
work with film study value beyond the XXX world.
The full frame 1.33 X 1 image is typical of documentary
production and the various quality throughout is to be expected. The Dolby Digital 2.0 sound is simple stereo
at best, though all the XXX footage that actually has sound is monophonic. Though some widescreen and even 3-D XXX
films were made in back in the day, we do not have any record as to if any of
them have any stereo or multi-channel stereo sound. On DVD, none of them pre-Penthouse Magazine’s Caligula has
been issued this way to date. Maybe
HDTV will change that. Extras include
previews for related Passport titles, including one called Striptease,
though it seems to overlap with this show a bit, and bonus footage includes the
following early silent footage expanded from the main feature:
A Roman Holiday (uncut, 1930s)
Caught In The Barbed Wire
Nude Diversion
Uncle Si & The Sirens (man
builds “TV” of radio parts which happens to capture constant images of nude
women in the outdoors)
Anonymous French Shorts
Dressage Au Fouet
Nothing hardcore, but very amusing just the same, which is
good for some laughs and history that cuts through the pretension of how the
post-XXX taped cinema is now. We’ll
never see an Internet equivalent of this.
- Nicholas Sheffo