Judgment
At Nuremberg
(1961/MGM DVD)
Picture: B- Sound:
B- Extras: C Film: A-
PLEASE
NOTE:
This film has been issued (ten years after this DVD release) in a
limited edition Blu-ray edition with more extras and you can see more
about it at this link:
http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/13183/Birdman+Of+Alcatraz+(1962)/Judgment+At+Nure
It
is often repeated that politics makes strange bedfellows. Never was
such an adage truer than American foreign policy during the Cold War.
In the name of national security, the United States occasionally
sided with nefarious dictators, ignored gross human rights abuses,
and forgave past digressions. These decisions were not without
complex debates over the limits of national security and the
protection of individual liberties. However, these discussions are
not restricted to the annals of history. In the post-September 11
era, politicians and pundits tussle over the ethical implications of
racial profiling, invasive surveillance and harsh prisoner treatment
as avenues for securing the nation. Like many films that deliberate
over contemporary anxieties, Stanley Kramer's 1961 masterpiece,
Judgment
at Nuremberg,
is as poignant today as it was when originally released. Nominated
for eleven Academy awards, and winner of two, Judgment
at Nuremberg
stands as one of the most compelling and unapologetic ruminations on
the complexity of moral culpability.
The
film opens with a dramatic explosion of a swastika, announcing the
destruction of the Nazi government. However, the residue of such a
regime is not as easy to eradicate, especially when Germany is
critical to defending Europe against the Soviet Empire. The
strategic importance of Germany led to a number of political
decisions not to embarrass the Germans. This highlights the central
tension developed in the film. Graced by an all-star cast (including
an unusually restrained William Shatner), Judgment
at Nuremberg
follows American judge Dan Haywood (deftly played by a tormented
Spencer Tracy) as he presides, along with two other jurists, over a
Nuremberg trial of four judges (including the eerily stoic Burt
Lancaster) accused of 'Legalizing'
Nazi war crimes. Uncertain why he is chosen to preside over this
trial, Tracy typifies the reluctant yet morally sagacious American.
Haywood, who is staying at the home of a now deceased Nazi army
officer, rebuffs the hierarchical traditions of aristocratic Germany,
for he is uncomfortable with chauffeurs and maids, who try to address
his every need. Interested in exploring why these guardians of
justice were so seduced by Nazism and did not defend individual
liberties, Haywood reads the past decisions and the political works
of Dr. Ernst Janning (Lancaster), who wrote landmark democratic
treatises for the Weimar Republic.
Unlike many other
courtroom dramas, a majority of the film takes place in the
courtroom, which enables greater development of the arguments than
simply the narrative. However, even the subplots within the
narrative serve to nuance the larger argument. The moral
uncompromising prosecuting attorney, Tad Lawson (played by a
passionate Richard Widmark) has tried numerous other Nuremberg cases,
and is on a crusade to punish every Nazi war criminal to the fullest
extend of the law. He uses every opportunity to display horrific
footage of the Holocaust (which is extremely graphic and powerful),
including calling himself up to stand to testify. However,
disenfranchised with humanity for allowing such deplorable acts and
the inconsistency of punishing those responsible, Lawson often turns
to the bottle. The defense attorney, Hans Rolfe (a rhetorically
savvy Maximilian Schell), wishing to defend and impress his legal
idols, advances an ardent rejoinder that focuses on their juridical
impotence within such oppressive conditions. Moreover, given such
circumstances and claiming that they were unaware of such atrocities,
such men should not be found guilty, because that only indicts the
entire German population.
His befriending of a
Nazi officer widow, Madame Bertholt (brought to life by the
incomparable Marlene Dietrich), complicates Haywood's job, the former
owner of the house he now lives in. Bertholt contends that she, like
the rest of the German people did not know of these war crimes
(Haywood's common sensical retort is that six million people do not
just go missing and nobody notices). As a result, she and other
American operatives argue that it is important not to punish, or even
embarrass, all of Germany (an argument that did carry some weight at
the time because the result of previous national embarrassment led to
the rise of Hitler).
Haywood's decision is
troubled by the added pressure of American politicos who implore
Haywood to not punish these prestigious German figures too harshly,
despite the testimony of Dr. Janning, who breaks company with the
defense and admits to wrongdoing and their responsibility in
Germany's gross miscarriage of justice. The resolution, however,
speaks to the difficulty of determining moral culpability in a world
governed by real politick.
All
told, the film, just over three hours long (which might be a bit too
long), is buoyed by an excellent cast delivering wonderful pieces of
oratory. Unlike other courtroom dramas that rest on clever (or not
so clever) plot twists or evidentiary discoveries, Judgment
at Nuremberg
is a rather clear-cut case where the only real tension resides in the
characters' response such arguments.
This special edition
DVD from MGM boasts a rather solid transfer (letterboxed, not
anamorphic) and the sound quality is fair (5.1 surround and the
original mono), given the age of the film (MGM usually does an all
right job with the older films). However, the special edition is not
too special, given the historical importance of the film. In
addition to a theatrical trailer and photo gallery, the disc includes
a rather interesting conversation between Abby Mann (screenwriter)
and Maximilian Schell, a tribute to Stanley Kramer and an Abby Mann
narrated piece for the book. All features provide some depth to the
film, but I think commentary by a World War II or legal scholar, in
addition to a film historian would be a wonderful addition to such a
film (since pretty much everyone who work on the film has passed on
to the giant courtroom in the sky). Given the reasonable price and
improbability of a newer version ever coming out, this would be a
solid addition to any DVD collection.
- Ron Von Burg